TY - JOUR
T1 - Value of adaptive water resources management in Northern California under climatic variability and change
T2 - Reservoir management
AU - Georgakakos, A. P.
AU - Yao, H.
AU - Kistenmacher, M.
AU - Georgakakos, K. P.
AU - Graham, N. E.
AU - Cheng, F. Y.
AU - Spencer, C.
AU - Shamir, E.
N1 - Funding Information:
The study reported in this and the companion paper ( Georgakakos et al., this issue ) was supported by the California Energy Commission through Award No.: 500-07-013 . The data support, comments and suggestions of Guido Franco of the Energy Commission and of Robert Hartman and Peter Fickenscher of the California Nevada River Forecast Center of the US National Weather Service, NOAA are gratefully acknowledged.
PY - 2012/1/4
Y1 - 2012/1/4
N2 - This article aims to assess the value of adaptive reservoir management versus traditional operation practices in the context of climatic change for Northern California. The assessment uses adaptive decision model being developed for planning and operational management of the Northern California (central valley) water resources system (HRC-GWRI, 2007), coupled with a dynamic downscaling and hydrologic modeling system described in Georgakakos et al. (this issue). The assessment process compares the water system response in four simulated scenarios, pertaining to two management policies (traditional and adaptive) and two hydrologic data sets (one for the historical and a second for a future scenario). The assessments show that the current policy, which is tuned to the historical hydrologic regime, is unable to cope effectively with the more variable future climate. As a result, the water supply, energy, and environmental water uses cannot be effectively satisfied during future droughts, exposing the system to higher vulnerabilities and risks. By contrast, the adaptive policy maintains similar performance under both hydrologic scenarios, suggesting that adaptive management constitutes an effective mitigation measure to climate change.
AB - This article aims to assess the value of adaptive reservoir management versus traditional operation practices in the context of climatic change for Northern California. The assessment uses adaptive decision model being developed for planning and operational management of the Northern California (central valley) water resources system (HRC-GWRI, 2007), coupled with a dynamic downscaling and hydrologic modeling system described in Georgakakos et al. (this issue). The assessment process compares the water system response in four simulated scenarios, pertaining to two management policies (traditional and adaptive) and two hydrologic data sets (one for the historical and a second for a future scenario). The assessments show that the current policy, which is tuned to the historical hydrologic regime, is unable to cope effectively with the more variable future climate. As a result, the water supply, energy, and environmental water uses cannot be effectively satisfied during future droughts, exposing the system to higher vulnerabilities and risks. By contrast, the adaptive policy maintains similar performance under both hydrologic scenarios, suggesting that adaptive management constitutes an effective mitigation measure to climate change.
KW - Adaptive water resources management
KW - California water resources
KW - Climate change impact assessment
KW - Dynamic downscaling
KW - Ensemble flow forecasting
KW - Risk-based decision support
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84155186700&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.04.038
DO - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.04.038
M3 - 期刊論文
AN - SCOPUS:84155186700
SN - 0022-1694
VL - 412-413
SP - 34
EP - 46
JO - Journal of Hydrology
JF - Journal of Hydrology
ER -