Prospect theory and the risk-return paradox: Some recent evidence

Pin Huang Chou, Robin K. Chou, Kuan Cheng Ko

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻期刊論文同行評審

19 引文 斯高帕斯(Scopus)

摘要

There is extensive evidence indicating a negative risk-return relation when a firm's performance is measured based on accounting measures such as return on asset (ROA) and return on equity (ROE). Previous studies show that the risk-return paradox can be explained by the prospect theory, which predicts that managers' risk attitudes are different for firms of different performances. However, those studies mostly use earlier data from the COMPUSTAT database, which suffers from a survivorship bias. Failure to account for delisting firms may understate the risk-return relation. We reexamine the mixture of risk-seeking and risk-averse behaviors based on an updated 20-year sample period that is free from the survivorship problem. Interestingly, our results show stronger and robust evidence supporting the prospect theory during the period from 1984 to 2003.

原文???core.languages.en_GB???
頁(從 - 到)193-208
頁數16
期刊Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting
33
發行號3
DOIs
出版狀態已出版 - 2009

指紋

深入研究「Prospect theory and the risk-return paradox: Some recent evidence」主題。共同形成了獨特的指紋。

引用此