TY - JOUR
T1 - Ion leakage, ion reflection, ion heating and shock‐front reformation in a simulated supercritical quasi‐parallel collisionless shock
AU - Lyu, L. H.
AU - Kan, J. R.
PY - 1990/7
Y1 - 1990/7
N2 - Ion reflection, ion leakage, ion heating and shock‐front reformation are studied based on the simulation results of a supercritical quasi‐parallel shock. The backstreaming ions upstream of the simulated shock are predominantly leakage ions. The leakage of downstream ions is regulated by the large‐amplitude waves in the shock transition region. These waves not only can act as a filter to reduce the leakage ion number density, but also can energize the backstreaming ions to result in the suprathermal upstream ions. The average temperature of the leakage ions is about 100 times that of the upstream incoming ions. The average leakage ion density is about 2% ∼ 3% of the upstream ion density. Ion reflections occur intermittently due to coherent ion scattering by the large‐amplitude whistler waves near the shock front. Most of the coherently reflected ions are subsequently scattered back toward the downstream to contribute to the ion heating. Only a small fraction of the reflected ions can escape upstream with an average number density about 0.1% ∼ 0.2% of the upstream ion density. The shock‐front appears to reform as characterized by the decay and reappearance of the large‐amplitude whistler waves near the shock ramp. We wish to propose a possible explanation for the shock‐front reformation process. Insufficient dissipation in the supercritical shock can lead to a highly‐steepened shock ramp, which in turn can emit large‐amplitude whistler waves to result in the ion reflection event. Since ion reflections can provide additional dissipation, to counter balance the nonlinear steepening and thereby reduce the wave amplitude and turn off the ion reflection event. The cycle of under‐dissipation followed by over‐dissipation is proposed to be a possible cause for the shock‐front reformation process.
AB - Ion reflection, ion leakage, ion heating and shock‐front reformation are studied based on the simulation results of a supercritical quasi‐parallel shock. The backstreaming ions upstream of the simulated shock are predominantly leakage ions. The leakage of downstream ions is regulated by the large‐amplitude waves in the shock transition region. These waves not only can act as a filter to reduce the leakage ion number density, but also can energize the backstreaming ions to result in the suprathermal upstream ions. The average temperature of the leakage ions is about 100 times that of the upstream incoming ions. The average leakage ion density is about 2% ∼ 3% of the upstream ion density. Ion reflections occur intermittently due to coherent ion scattering by the large‐amplitude whistler waves near the shock front. Most of the coherently reflected ions are subsequently scattered back toward the downstream to contribute to the ion heating. Only a small fraction of the reflected ions can escape upstream with an average number density about 0.1% ∼ 0.2% of the upstream ion density. The shock‐front appears to reform as characterized by the decay and reappearance of the large‐amplitude whistler waves near the shock ramp. We wish to propose a possible explanation for the shock‐front reformation process. Insufficient dissipation in the supercritical shock can lead to a highly‐steepened shock ramp, which in turn can emit large‐amplitude whistler waves to result in the ion reflection event. Since ion reflections can provide additional dissipation, to counter balance the nonlinear steepening and thereby reduce the wave amplitude and turn off the ion reflection event. The cycle of under‐dissipation followed by over‐dissipation is proposed to be a possible cause for the shock‐front reformation process.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85005499500&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1029/GL017i008p01041
DO - 10.1029/GL017i008p01041
M3 - 期刊論文
AN - SCOPUS:85005499500
SN - 0094-8276
VL - 17
SP - 1041
EP - 1044
JO - Geophysical Research Letters
JF - Geophysical Research Letters
IS - 8
ER -