Effects of bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation on motor recovery in subacute stroke patients: a double-blind, randomized sham-controlled trial

Keyphrases

• Action Research Arm Test 18%
• Adverse Effects 9%
• Between-group 9%
• Bihemispheric 100%
• Connectivity Change 9%
• Contralesional 9%
• Cortex 9%
• Cortical Excitability 9%
• Corticospinal Tract 9%
• Corticospinal Tract Integrity 9%
• Efficacy Outcomes 9%
• First-ever Ischemic Stroke 9%
• Forearm 9%
• Fugl-Meyer Assessment 45%
• Functional Connectivity 18%
• Functional Connectivity Strength 9%
• Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging 9%
• Interhemispheric 9%
• Interhemispheric Connectivity 9%
• Interhemispheric Interaction 9%
• Ipsilesional 27%
• Lower Extremity 18%
• Moderate to Severe 9%
• Motor Evoked Potential 9%
• Motor Recovery 100%
• Neuromodulation 9%
• Nineteen 9%
• Post-stroke 27%
• Primary Motor Cortex 9%
• Randomized Sham-controlled Trial 100%
• Responder Rate 9%
• Resting-state Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (rs-fMRI) 9%
• Sham 27%
• Stimulation Efficacy 9%
• Stroke Patients 100%
• Stroke Recovery 9%
• Subacute Stroke 100%
• Subcortical Regions 9%
• Subgroup Analysis 9%
• Task Practice 9%
• Task-oriented Training 9%
• Transcranial Direct-current Stimulation (tDCS) 100%
• Trial Registration 9%
• Twice Daily 9%
• Upper Extremity 45%

Neuroscience

• Adverse Effect 9%
• Brain Ischemia 9%
• Cerebrovascular Accident 100%
• Excitability 9%
• Functional Connectivity 27%
• Magnetic Resonance Imaging 9%
• Motor Evoked Potential 9%
• Neuromodulation 9%
• Primary Motor Cortex 9%
• Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation 100%