摘要
Industry returns cannot be explained fully by well-known asset pricing models. This study reveals that common factors extracted from industry returns carry significant risk premiums that go beyond the explanatory power of size, book-to-market (BM) ratios, and momentum. In particular, this study shows that (1) the small-firm effect is significant only for firms whose market capitalization is below their industry average; (2) the BM effect is an intra-industry phenomenon; (3) a one-year momentum effect is significant only for firms whose BM ratio is smaller than the industry average and limited to non-January months; and (4) there is seasonality in all effects that cannot be explained by risk-based asset-pricing models. Neither rational nor behavioral theories alone can explain industry returns, and it is perhaps too hasty to attribute asset pricing anomalies to a single driving force.
| 原文 | ???core.languages.en_GB??? |
|---|---|
| 頁(從 - 到) | 355-370 |
| 頁數 | 16 |
| 期刊 | Journal of Banking and Finance |
| 卷 | 36 |
| 發行號 | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| 出版狀態 | 已出版 - 2月 2012 |
指紋
深入研究「Do industries matter in explaining stock returns and asset-pricing anomalies?」主題。共同形成了獨特的指紋。引用此
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver