@article{2428d1e4520a4da7b8b8f9e3efc7ea2f,
title = "Do industries matter in explaining stock returns and asset-pricing anomalies?",
abstract = "Industry returns cannot be explained fully by well-known asset pricing models. This study reveals that common factors extracted from industry returns carry significant risk premiums that go beyond the explanatory power of size, book-to-market (BM) ratios, and momentum. In particular, this study shows that (1) the small-firm effect is significant only for firms whose market capitalization is below their industry average; (2) the BM effect is an intra-industry phenomenon; (3) a one-year momentum effect is significant only for firms whose BM ratio is smaller than the industry average and limited to non-January months; and (4) there is seasonality in all effects that cannot be explained by risk-based asset-pricing models. Neither rational nor behavioral theories alone can explain industry returns, and it is perhaps too hasty to attribute asset pricing anomalies to a single driving force.",
keywords = "Asset pricing model, Cross-section, Industry",
author = "Chou, {Pin Huang} and Ho, {Po Hsin} and Ko, {Kuan Cheng}",
note = "Funding Information: Comments from Chaoshin Chiao, Huimin Chung, Yu-Jane Liu, Ching-Chih Lu, Guofu Zhou, and seminar participants at National Tsing Hua University, National Chengchi University, National Chiayi University, Ming Chuan University, and the 13th Conference on the Theories and Practice of Financial Markets (Kaohsiung, Taiwan) are gratefully acknowledged. We are especially indebted to the anonymous referee and Ike Mathur (the editor) for their valuable comments that significantly enrich the content of the paper. Chou acknowledges financial support from the National Science Council of Taiwan (Grant no: NSC 93-2416-H-008-019). ",
year = "2012",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.07.016",
language = "???core.languages.en_GB???",
volume = "36",
pages = "355--370",
journal = "Journal of Banking and Finance",
issn = "0378-4266",
number = "2",
}