摘要
This research employs Wildavsky's two strategies-anticipation and resilience-as our conceptual framework to compare COVID-19 policies in the United States, South Korea, and Taiwan. Also, following Handmer and Dovers' three types of resilience, we develop theory-driven codes and then explain how governmental structures and cultural factors influenced governmental responses. We found that a key response to this pandemic is arguably correlated with how quick and flexible a government can adopt different types of resilient strategies. Our research provides a foundation for governmental emergency response discussions and management strategies to better cope with public health crises in the future.
| 原文 | ???core.languages.en_GB??? |
|---|---|
| 頁(從 - 到) | 227-239 |
| 頁數 | 13 |
| 期刊 | Journal of Emergency Management |
| 卷 | 21 |
| 發行號 | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| 出版狀態 | 已出版 - 2023 |
UN SDG
此研究成果有助於以下永續發展目標
-
SDG 3 良好的健康和福祉
指紋
深入研究「Anticipation or resilience in times of emergent crisis? COVID-19 responses in the United States, Taiwan, and South Korea」主題。共同形成了獨特的指紋。引用此
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver