摘要
This research employs Wildavsky's two strategies-anticipation and resilience-as our conceptual framework to compare COVID-19 policies in the United States, South Korea, and Taiwan. Also, following Handmer and Dovers' three types of resilience, we develop theory-driven codes and then explain how governmental structures and cultural factors influenced governmental responses. We found that a key response to this pandemic is arguably correlated with how quick and flexible a government can adopt different types of resilient strategies. Our research provides a foundation for governmental emergency response discussions and management strategies to better cope with public health crises in the future.
原文 | ???core.languages.en_GB??? |
---|---|
頁(從 - 到) | 227-239 |
頁數 | 13 |
期刊 | Journal of Emergency Management |
卷 | 21 |
發行號 | 7 |
DOIs | |
出版狀態 | 已出版 - 2023 |