TY - JOUR
T1 - TMS over right posterior parietal cortex induces neglect in a scene-based frame of reference
AU - Muggleton, Neil G.
AU - Postma, Peggy
AU - Moutsopoulou, Karolina
AU - Nimmo-Smith, Ian
AU - Marcel, Anthony
AU - Walsh, Vincent
N1 - Funding Information:
VW and NM are grateful for the support of The Wellcome Trust and the Medical Research Council. VW is a Royal Society University Research Fellow.
PY - 2006
Y1 - 2006
N2 - Although damage to right posterior parietal cortex (RPPC) produces bias in line bisection, Karnath et al. [Karnath, H.-O., Berger, M. F., Küker, W., & Rorden, C. (2004). The anatomy of spatial neglect based on voxelwise statistical analysis: A study of 140 patients. Cerebral Cortex, 14, 1164-1172] claim that it plays little role in spatial neglect, which is better measured by target cancellation. We used a detection task (approximating cancellation in requiring detection) to investigate this claim by compromising the parietal cortex with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Two outline shapes, one on each side of fixation, were briefly displayed before a mask. The target was a discontinuity in the left or right of the outline of one of these perceptual objects. Subjects indicated position or absence of target as fast as possible. Stimulus-mask onset asynchrony was adjusted individually to yield 75% detection. TMS was delivered over left posterior parietal cortex (LPPC), RPPC and Vertex, with Sham TMS over RPPC as a baseline control. Target detection was near ceiling and fastest at central positions and worst and slowest at the far right. Detection was significantly reduced at the far left position by TMS over RPPC. No other effects were obtained and latency was not affected by TMS. Disruption of RPPC by TMS does produce left neglect as measured by detection. Given the pattern of performance and since it was disrupted on one side of the display rather than on one side of each shape, attention and neglect were in a scene-based rather than object-based reference frame.
AB - Although damage to right posterior parietal cortex (RPPC) produces bias in line bisection, Karnath et al. [Karnath, H.-O., Berger, M. F., Küker, W., & Rorden, C. (2004). The anatomy of spatial neglect based on voxelwise statistical analysis: A study of 140 patients. Cerebral Cortex, 14, 1164-1172] claim that it plays little role in spatial neglect, which is better measured by target cancellation. We used a detection task (approximating cancellation in requiring detection) to investigate this claim by compromising the parietal cortex with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Two outline shapes, one on each side of fixation, were briefly displayed before a mask. The target was a discontinuity in the left or right of the outline of one of these perceptual objects. Subjects indicated position or absence of target as fast as possible. Stimulus-mask onset asynchrony was adjusted individually to yield 75% detection. TMS was delivered over left posterior parietal cortex (LPPC), RPPC and Vertex, with Sham TMS over RPPC as a baseline control. Target detection was near ceiling and fastest at central positions and worst and slowest at the far right. Detection was significantly reduced at the far left position by TMS over RPPC. No other effects were obtained and latency was not affected by TMS. Disruption of RPPC by TMS does produce left neglect as measured by detection. Given the pattern of performance and since it was disrupted on one side of the display rather than on one side of each shape, attention and neglect were in a scene-based rather than object-based reference frame.
KW - Frame of reference
KW - Parietal cortex
KW - Spatial neglect
KW - Transcranial magnetic stimulation
KW - Visual search
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646104424&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.10.004
DO - 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.10.004
M3 - 期刊論文
C2 - 16490222
AN - SCOPUS:33646104424
SN - 0028-3932
VL - 44
SP - 1222
EP - 1229
JO - Neuropsychologia
JF - Neuropsychologia
IS - 7
ER -