TY - JOUR
T1 - Study to minimize learning progress differences in software learning class using PLITAZ system
AU - Dong, Jian Jie
AU - Hwang, Wu Yuin
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgment This work was supported in part by the National Science Council (NSC), Taiwan, ROC, under Grant NSC 98-2511-S-008-008-MY3, NSC and 98-2511-S-008-005-MY3. Besides, the researchers thanks to the editor Prof. J. Michael Spector and all the reviewers’ suggestions and comments that helped the researchers revise the paper.
PY - 2012/6
Y1 - 2012/6
N2 - This study developed a system using two-phased strategies called "Pause Lecture, Instant Tutor-Tutee Match, and Attention Zone" (PLITAZ). This system was used to help solve learning challenges and to minimize learning progress differences in a software learning class. During a teacher's lecture time, students were encouraged to anonymously express their desire to pause the lecture, or to take a short break, in order to catch up with a teacher's lecture. A simple proportion of one-third of the class was found to be a suitable pause-lecture threshold to prevent learning progress differences from becoming too great as well as to provide enough peer tutorial resources. During students' practice time, an instant tutor-tutee match strategy extended tutorial resources, which took 60% workload from the teacher. Meanwhile, the attention zone (AZ) strategy helped the teacher to identify students with low levels of learning progress, as AZ students who needed more attention. It was found that AZ student numbers had a negative relation to overall learning achievement. Furthermore, 49% of the identified AZ students who received PLITAZ strategies experienced improved learning progress over identified non-AZ students. Overall learning progress differences were significantly minimized with the Instant Tutor-Tutee Match and Attention Zone strategies.
AB - This study developed a system using two-phased strategies called "Pause Lecture, Instant Tutor-Tutee Match, and Attention Zone" (PLITAZ). This system was used to help solve learning challenges and to minimize learning progress differences in a software learning class. During a teacher's lecture time, students were encouraged to anonymously express their desire to pause the lecture, or to take a short break, in order to catch up with a teacher's lecture. A simple proportion of one-third of the class was found to be a suitable pause-lecture threshold to prevent learning progress differences from becoming too great as well as to provide enough peer tutorial resources. During students' practice time, an instant tutor-tutee match strategy extended tutorial resources, which took 60% workload from the teacher. Meanwhile, the attention zone (AZ) strategy helped the teacher to identify students with low levels of learning progress, as AZ students who needed more attention. It was found that AZ student numbers had a negative relation to overall learning achievement. Furthermore, 49% of the identified AZ students who received PLITAZ strategies experienced improved learning progress over identified non-AZ students. Overall learning progress differences were significantly minimized with the Instant Tutor-Tutee Match and Attention Zone strategies.
KW - Attention zone
KW - Instant tutor-tutee match
KW - Learning challenges
KW - Learning progress differences
KW - Pause lecture intention
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861189918&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11423-012-9233-x
DO - 10.1007/s11423-012-9233-x
M3 - 期刊論文
AN - SCOPUS:84861189918
SN - 1042-1629
VL - 60
SP - 501
EP - 527
JO - Educational Technology Research and Development
JF - Educational Technology Research and Development
IS - 3
ER -