Abstract
We re-examine the impact of short-sale constraints (SSC) on market stabilization via realized jump activities during 2002-2009 to circumvent the reverse causality in identifying the policy effects of SSC. We observed that the abnormal downturns under tighter short sale constraints are significantly larger whereas there is no difference for abnormal upturns. Our empirical results survive across a sequence of robustness examinations controlled for market illiquidity. The findings do not support the claims by regulators that restraining short-sales can stabilize prices; instead, SSC has led to a less efficient market with stronger extreme downward returns.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 238-246 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Finance Research Letters |
Volume | 11 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Sep 2014 |
Keywords
- Jump intensity
- Jump size
- Liquidity
- Market stabilization
- Put-call-parity
- Short sale constraint