Pay for (individual) performance: Issues, claims, evidence and the role of sorting effects

Barry Gerhart, Meiyu Fang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

143 Scopus citations

Abstract

We address two broad questions: how much pay for individual performance (PFIP) is there and what are the positive and negative effects of PFIP? We consider specific claims, including that PFIP does not motivate (or even de-motivates), that it is ineffective in teams, and that it is ineffective in some national cultures. We demonstrate how incorporating sorting effects of PFIP into conceptual treatments of PFIP can change how one views the likely effectiveness of PFIP across contexts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)41-52
Number of pages12
JournalHuman Resource Management Review
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Keywords

  • Compensation
  • Incentives
  • Motivation
  • Pay for performance
  • Performance
  • Sorting

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pay for (individual) performance: Issues, claims, evidence and the role of sorting effects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this