Matching/mismatching revisited: An empirical study of learning and teaching styles

Nigel Ford, Sherry Y. Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

186 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper presents results of a research project that explored the relationship between matching and mismatching instructional presentation style (breadth-first and depth-first) with students' cognitive style (field-dependence/-independence) in a computer-based learning environment. 73 postgraduate students were asked to create Web pages using HTML, using instructional materials that were either matched or mismatched with their cognitive styles. Significant differences in performance on a multiple choice test of conceptual knowledge were found for students learning in matched and mismatched conditions. Performance in matched conditions was significantly superior to that in mismatched conditions. However, significant effects were found for gender, matching mainly affecting male students. Performance on a practical test of Web page creation was not linked to matching or mismatching, but was linked to an interaction between gender and instructional presentation style. The findings provide support for the notion that matching and mismatching can have significant effects on learning outcomes. The paper concludes with suggestions for further research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5-22
Number of pages18
JournalBritish Journal of Educational Technology
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2001

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Matching/mismatching revisited: An empirical study of learning and teaching styles'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this