Is there a processing preference for object relative clauses in Chinese? Evidence from ERPs

Talat Bulut, Shih Kuen Cheng, Kun Yu Xu, Daisy L. Hung, Denise H. Wu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations


A consistent finding across head-initial languages, such as English, is that subject relative clauses (SRCs) are easier to comprehend than object relative clauses (ORCs). However, several studies in Mandarin Chinese, a head-final language, revealed the opposite pattern, which might be modulated by working memory (WM) as suggested by recent results from self-paced reading performance. In the present study, event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded when participants with high and low WM spans (measured by forward digit span and operation span tests) read Chinese ORCs and SRCs. The results revealed an N400-P600 complex elicited by ORCs on the relativizer, whose magnitude was modulated by the WM span. On the other hand, a P600 effect was elicited by SRCs on the head noun, whose magnitude was not affected by the WM span. These findings paint a complex picture of relative clause processing in Chinese such that opposing factors involving structural ambiguities and integration of filler-gap dependencies influence processing dynamics in Chinese relative clauses.

Original languageEnglish
Article number995
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Issue numberJUL
StatePublished - 9 Jul 2018


  • Chinese sentence comprehension
  • Event-related potentials
  • Integration resources
  • Linear distance
  • Relative clauses
  • Storage resources
  • Structural distance
  • Working memory


Dive into the research topics of 'Is there a processing preference for object relative clauses in Chinese? Evidence from ERPs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this