TY - JOUR
T1 - Intercomparison of radar data assimilation systems for snowfall cases during the ICE-POP 2018
AU - Lee, Ji Won
AU - Min, Ki Hong
AU - Chung, Kao Shen
AU - You, Cheng Rong
AU - Ke, Chieh Ying
AU - Lee, Gyu Won
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024
PY - 2025/3
Y1 - 2025/3
N2 - This study compares two data assimilation (DA) methods, the Local Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter (LETKF) and three-dimensional variational analysis (3DVAR), in the assimilation of high-resolution three-dimensional remote sensing data. Different observation operators are applied to each DA method to reflect its specific characteristics and to provide best analysis for precipitation forecast over complex terrain. Since radial velocity has a linear relationship with wind components, it applies relatively easily to both DA methods. However, reflectivity has a nonlinear relationship with model state variables and LETKF applies direct DA, while 3DVAR uses indirect DA. A detailed analysis of two specific snowfall cases using ICE-POP 2018 observational data reveals significant differences in wind field changes. In 3DVAR, strong convergence on the windward side and the rapid growth of water vapor into hydrometeors during the forecast period lead to an overestimation of precipitation. In contrast, LETKF improves the simulation of airflow over mountains and enhances precipitation accuracy, attributed to the background error covariance matrix and observation operator. For accurate winter precipitation forecasts over complex terrain, high-resolution data and advanced DA techniques like LETKF are necessary, as they greatly improve snowfall prediction accuracy.
AB - This study compares two data assimilation (DA) methods, the Local Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter (LETKF) and three-dimensional variational analysis (3DVAR), in the assimilation of high-resolution three-dimensional remote sensing data. Different observation operators are applied to each DA method to reflect its specific characteristics and to provide best analysis for precipitation forecast over complex terrain. Since radial velocity has a linear relationship with wind components, it applies relatively easily to both DA methods. However, reflectivity has a nonlinear relationship with model state variables and LETKF applies direct DA, while 3DVAR uses indirect DA. A detailed analysis of two specific snowfall cases using ICE-POP 2018 observational data reveals significant differences in wind field changes. In 3DVAR, strong convergence on the windward side and the rapid growth of water vapor into hydrometeors during the forecast period lead to an overestimation of precipitation. In contrast, LETKF improves the simulation of airflow over mountains and enhances precipitation accuracy, attributed to the background error covariance matrix and observation operator. For accurate winter precipitation forecasts over complex terrain, high-resolution data and advanced DA techniques like LETKF are necessary, as they greatly improve snowfall prediction accuracy.
KW - Complex terrains precipitation forecasts
KW - Local ensemble transform Kalman filter data assimilation
KW - Observation operator
KW - Radar data assimilation
KW - Three-dimensional variational data assimilation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85209911435&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.atmosres.2024.107804
DO - 10.1016/j.atmosres.2024.107804
M3 - 期刊論文
AN - SCOPUS:85209911435
SN - 0169-8095
VL - 314
JO - Atmospheric Research
JF - Atmospheric Research
M1 - 107804
ER -