From Ann Brown to Deanna Kuhn: a tale of two research perspectives on learning

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

This paper examines two research perspectives on learning–developmental psychology and the learning sciences. We compare and contrast works from two leading researchers–Deanna Kuhn and Ann Brown–as a way to illustrate how questions and research on learning, such as problem-solving, inquiry, metacognition, self-directed learning, are raised and answered. The developmental psychology perspectives, represented by Deanna Kuhn, often highlight individual attributes, foregrounding deep understanding of what is in the head. The learning sciences perspectives, manifested by Ann Brown, inquire learning taking place within the material, social, and cultural contexts, foregrounding the design of what the head is in. The former takes an observer-evaluator-theorizer position to understand how learning develops over time. The later takes an ethnographer-designer-interventionist-theorizer position to understand how individual and group learning can be changed via design. This paper contributes to the delineation of two leading ways to understand how people learn. It informs researchers how research tool kits are shaped when their research commitments differ.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)100-111
Number of pages12
JournalLearning: Research and Practice
Volume2
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2 Jul 2016

Keywords

  • developmental psychology
  • learning sciences
  • research methodology
  • Research on learning
  • unit of analysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'From Ann Brown to Deanna Kuhn: a tale of two research perspectives on learning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this