TY - JOUR
T1 - FAILURE MODES OF CIRCULAR TUNNELS IN A TRANSVERSELY ISOTROPIC ROCK MASS
AU - Bui, Van Binh
AU - Tien, Yong Ming
AU - Juang, Charng Hsein
AU - Lu, Yu Chen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022. Journal of GeoEngineering. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - The stress concentration is one of the major causes of failure around the tunnel in a transversely isotropic rock mass. Knowledge about the features of damage helps tunnel engineers develop suitable countermeasures. In this paper, failure modes around the tunnel are studied through numerical analyses using the three-dimensional (3D) particle flow code (PFC3D). The transversely isotropic rock masses are generated with seven joint dip angles of 0°, 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 75°, and 90°. The tunnel excavation is simulated in 3D to study the effect of tunneling direction relative to the joint orientation on the tunnel stability. Various scenarios involving the tunneling direction, the joint strike, and joint dip are considered. Concerning the displacement around the tunnel, the displacement field (DF) may be grouped into one of the following four types: the tensile displacement field (DF-I and DF-II), the shear and tensile displacement field (DF-III), and the shear displacement along the joint (DF-IV). The failure mode may be described with one of the following five terms: (1) Detaching and Buckling, (2) Sliding, (3) Bending and Spalling, (4) Slabbing and Spalling, and (5) Falling. The failure modes at the crown, the sidewalls, and the invert of the tunnel in Scenarios 2 and 3 are similar. However, the failure modes in the tunnel face are different; the “Falling” mode is observed in Scenario 2, while the “Sliding” model is a risk in Scenario 3.
AB - The stress concentration is one of the major causes of failure around the tunnel in a transversely isotropic rock mass. Knowledge about the features of damage helps tunnel engineers develop suitable countermeasures. In this paper, failure modes around the tunnel are studied through numerical analyses using the three-dimensional (3D) particle flow code (PFC3D). The transversely isotropic rock masses are generated with seven joint dip angles of 0°, 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 75°, and 90°. The tunnel excavation is simulated in 3D to study the effect of tunneling direction relative to the joint orientation on the tunnel stability. Various scenarios involving the tunneling direction, the joint strike, and joint dip are considered. Concerning the displacement around the tunnel, the displacement field (DF) may be grouped into one of the following four types: the tensile displacement field (DF-I and DF-II), the shear and tensile displacement field (DF-III), and the shear displacement along the joint (DF-IV). The failure mode may be described with one of the following five terms: (1) Detaching and Buckling, (2) Sliding, (3) Bending and Spalling, (4) Slabbing and Spalling, and (5) Falling. The failure modes at the crown, the sidewalls, and the invert of the tunnel in Scenarios 2 and 3 are similar. However, the failure modes in the tunnel face are different; the “Falling” mode is observed in Scenario 2, while the “Sliding” model is a risk in Scenario 3.
KW - Anisotropic rock mass
KW - Discrete element method
KW - Failure modes
KW - Joint orientation
KW - Tunnel stability
KW - Tunneling direction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129272244&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.6310/jog.202203_17(1).4
DO - 10.6310/jog.202203_17(1).4
M3 - 期刊論文
AN - SCOPUS:85129272244
SN - 1990-8326
VL - 17
SP - 33
EP - 46
JO - Journal of GeoEngineering
JF - Journal of GeoEngineering
IS - 1
ER -