Comparison between SVM-Light, a search engine-based approach and the MediaMill baselines for assigning concepts to video shot annotations

George Shih Wen Ke, Michael P. Oakes, Marco A. Palomino, Yan Xu

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper describes work performed at the University of Sunderland as part of the EU-funded VITALAS project. Text feature vectors, extracted from the TRECVID video data set, were submitted to an SVM-Light implementation of Support Vector Machine, which aimed to label each video shot with the relevant concepts from the 101-concept MediaMill set. Sunderland also developed a search engine designed to match text queries derived from the test data against concept descriptors derived from the training data using the TF.IDF measure. The search engine-based approach outperformed SVM-Light, but did not perform overall as well as the MediaMill baseline for text feature extraction. However, the search-engine approach is much simpler than the supervised learning approach of MediaMill, and did outperform the MediaMill baseline for 31 of the 101 concept categories.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2008 International Workshop on Content-Based Multimedia Indexing, CBMI 2008, Conference Proceedings
Pages381-387
Number of pages7
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008
Event2008 International Workshop on Content-Based Multimedia Indexing, CBMI 2008 - London, United Kingdom
Duration: 18 Jun 200820 Jun 2008

Publication series

Name2008 International Workshop on Content-Based Multimedia Indexing, CBMI 2008, Conference Proceedings

Conference

Conference2008 International Workshop on Content-Based Multimedia Indexing, CBMI 2008
Country/TerritoryUnited Kingdom
CityLondon
Period18/06/0820/06/08

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison between SVM-Light, a search engine-based approach and the MediaMill baselines for assigning concepts to video shot annotations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this