Are TED Talks Potential Materials for Learning Specialized Vocabulary? A Case of Medical Vocabulary

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Specialized vocabulary is essential to second language (L2) students studying English for specific purposes (ESP) because it makes up a great proportion of words in specialized texts. While the potential for learning specialized vocabulary through audiovisual inputs (e.g., TV programs and movies) have been recognized, the potential for learning specialized vocabulary from the widely used audiovisual resource, TED talks, has not been explored. This study thus aims to explore if TED talks can be potential materials for improving students’ knowledge of specialized vocabulary through examining the vocabulary on the Medical Spoken Word List (MSWL) in medicine-related TED talks. Results show that 861 out of the 895 MSWL words (96.2%) occur in the TED talks, and an average of 100 MSWL words appear in a single TED talk, suggesting that students are very likely to encounter much specialized vocabulary when viewing TED talks. Compared to medicine-related TV drama series, another audiovisual resource supportive for learning the MSWL words, the TED talks actually contain a higher density of MSWL words, suggesting that it might be more efficient for students to view TED talks for improving their medical vocabulary. This study also provides pedagogical implications regarding the application of TED talks for ESP instruction.

Translated title of the contributionTED Talks是學習專業詞彙的潛在資源嗎?:以醫學詞彙為例
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)97-118
Number of pages22
JournalEnglish Teaching and Learning
Volume47
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2023

Keywords

  • English for specific purposes
  • Incidental learning
  • Medical English
  • Specialized vocabulary
  • TED talks

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are TED Talks Potential Materials for Learning Specialized Vocabulary? A Case of Medical Vocabulary'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this