Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Anticipation or resilience in times of emergent crisis? COVID-19 responses in the United States, Taiwan, and South Korea

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

This research employs Wildavsky's two strategies-anticipation and resilience-as our conceptual framework to compare COVID-19 policies in the United States, South Korea, and Taiwan. Also, following Handmer and Dovers' three types of resilience, we develop theory-driven codes and then explain how governmental structures and cultural factors influenced governmental responses. We found that a key response to this pandemic is arguably correlated with how quick and flexible a government can adopt different types of resilient strategies. Our research provides a foundation for governmental emergency response discussions and management strategies to better cope with public health crises in the future.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)227-239
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Emergency Management
Volume21
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 2023

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • COVID-19 response
  • content analysis
  • crisis management
  • international and comparative studies
  • public health policy
  • qualitative research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Anticipation or resilience in times of emergent crisis? COVID-19 responses in the United States, Taiwan, and South Korea'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this