Abstract
This research employs Wildavsky's two strategies-anticipation and resilience-as our conceptual framework to compare COVID-19 policies in the United States, South Korea, and Taiwan. Also, following Handmer and Dovers' three types of resilience, we develop theory-driven codes and then explain how governmental structures and cultural factors influenced governmental responses. We found that a key response to this pandemic is arguably correlated with how quick and flexible a government can adopt different types of resilient strategies. Our research provides a foundation for governmental emergency response discussions and management strategies to better cope with public health crises in the future.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 227-239 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Journal of Emergency Management |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2023 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- COVID-19 response
- content analysis
- crisis management
- international and comparative studies
- public health policy
- qualitative research
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Anticipation or resilience in times of emergent crisis? COVID-19 responses in the United States, Taiwan, and South Korea'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver