Abstract
This research employs Wildavsky's two strategies-anticipation and resilience-as our conceptual framework to compare COVID-19 policies in the United States, South Korea, and Taiwan. Also, following Handmer and Dovers' three types of resilience, we develop theory-driven codes and then explain how governmental structures and cultural factors influenced governmental responses. We found that a key response to this pandemic is arguably correlated with how quick and flexible a government can adopt different types of resilient strategies. Our research provides a foundation for governmental emergency response discussions and management strategies to better cope with public health crises in the future.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 227-239 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Journal of Emergency Management |
Volume | 21 |
Issue number | 7 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2023 |
Keywords
- COVID-19 response
- content analysis
- crisis management
- international and comparative studies
- public health policy
- qualitative research